In a latter article in War, Literature, and the Arts, Perry D Luckett took to task several critics writing for a special edition of Vietnam Generation that was dedicated to analyzing the representations of African Americans in the literature and popular refinement of the war. Especially galling to Luckett was Herman Beavers's article "Contemporary Afro-American Studies and the thought of the Vietnam War," in which Beavers argues among other things, that white-authored representations have "ideologically entrapped" the images of the war, leading to a situation in which "black and white soldiers [are] de-racialized" and we as readers are no longer "able to make distinctions between black and white" (9) Beavers further argues that, in lieu of our seeking public more accurately drawn representations by way of black authors, which he quite correctly notes are scarce, we instead have result to depend on white narrators, who mistakenly be wrought up that, "against all odds, they understand the black grunt" and are thereby able to "decode the black neighborhood in the war" (10, 12) Luckett rejoins that "these accusations of inattention and negative treatment are clearly exaggerated for positively depicted black soldiers are ubiquitous in Vietnam narratives" (1) Indeed, admitting Luckett's major criterion, "sympathetic treatment," be seens finally to miss the point of Beavers's contention, his argument that white Vietnam authors have gladly granted black characters their proportionate share of the page nevertheless rings constant especially in works written in the past fifteen years (25)(1)
While this dispute prompts a recapitulation of the issues first joined in the sixties in answer to William Styron's novel The Confessions of Nat gymnast as well as some more novel eruptions of identity politics, the fact is that the two critics seem to miss a a great deal of larger issue. The major question, it seems--the the same that neither Beavers nor Luckett ultimately asks--is not to what degree blacks have been represented by means of white authors but rather by what means they have been represented at black ones, because what is remarkable is that to such a degree few works in general, and memoirs in particular, have been written about Vietnam according to African American veterans. Of the almost 600 Vietnam novels listed in Sandra Wittman's 1989 bibliography Writing about Vietnam, and nothing else 6 are black-authored: Coming fireside (1971) by George Davis, De Mojo down in the mouths (1985) by A. R. Flowers, Shaw's Nam (1986) through John Cam, Captain Blackman (1972) by means of John A. Williams, Runner Mack (1972) at Barry Beckham, and Fallen Angels (1988) on Walter Dean Myers--only the first three of which were written from Vietnam veterans. There are yet four war-centered collections of poesy by African American survivors of Vietnam: Dien Cai Dau (1988) by dint of Yusef Komunyakaa, Between a stone and a Hard Place (1977) and In the Grass (1995) at Horace Coleman, and Mad Minute (1990) by dint of Lamont B. Steptoe. In addition, there are sum of two units oral histories: Wallace Terry's kindreds (1985) and Brothers: Black Soldiers in the Nam (1985) which Clark Smith assembled from taped interviews of sum of two units black veterans, Stanley Goff and Robert Sanders.
Similarly, of the almost 400 self-generated memoirs according to American Vietnam participants, only seven--les than sum of two units percent--are by African Americans. Further, not no other than are black-authored Vietnam autobiographies relatively not many in number, but there has not been a recent one published in over ten years, and no other than the most recent, Eddie Wright's fancys about the Vietnam War (1984) was compos exclusively in the post-Vietnam era. Four of the remaining memoirs were written before the war was over--David Parks's GI Diary (1968) Samuel Vance's The Courageous and the high-spirited (1970), Terry Whitmore's Memphis-Nam-Sweden: The Autobiography of a Black American Exile (1971) and Fenton Williams's lust Before the Dawn: A Doctor's Experiences in Vietnam (1971) The other brace A Hero's Welcome: The Conscience of Sergeant James Daly versus the United States Arm), by the agency of James Daly and Yet Another Voice by the agency of Norman A. McDaniel, both POW were published in 1975 within pair years of the authors' release. This makes all six somewhat anomalous with the majority of white-authored narratives, which for the mostly part were, and are, being published several years after the writers' Vietnam experiences.
Congruent with this paucity of primary works is the lack of critical consideration. To date, sole one critic, Norman Harris, has fabricateed anything approaching a comprehensive theory for analyzing and interpreting the African American literature of Vietnam. In his 1986 article "Blacks in Vietnam: A Holistic Perspective" (partially recapitulated in his 1988 work Connecting Times), Harris states that there is a "holistic" (which is to say identifiably representative) way or "movement" that characterizes not sole African American fiction of Vietnam however also what he calls "real world" black experiences (121) the pair "fictive and real life characters" prevail upon through three stages in Harris's theory, either maturing into abounding "historical consciousness," if they completed the movement, or remaining trapped in "historical amnesia," if they are arrested at any point. According to Hams, the three stages include: "[1] the desire to show fighting skills and thereby be deliberation American, [2] the subsequent disillusionment occasioned from various forms of racism, and [3] the cultural historical search for clarifying precedents" Together, these provide "an interfacing of [the fictive and the real] worlds useful to determining to what extent African Americans in the world dealt with the contradictions of the war" (125) The desired third stage, historical consciousness, is single in which the black character--or [i]role[/i] as the case may be--finally arrives to realize his (or, conceivably, her, although he cites no examples of women veterans) place in "the historical continuity of whites' separated promises to Blacks after a war ends" (129)